"Klaudio Zic" <rtrrt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote in message news:073490b4-358b-4911-b159-6d6f1bd464ca@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Largest dwarf planets as delineated by http://lulu.com/astrology > > ******************************************************************************* > JPL/DASTCOM3 Small-body Search Results > 2008-Apr-17 > 10:05:37 > > Asteroids only parameter > search: > H < 5.; > > Matching small-bodies: > > Record # Epoch-yr Primary Desig Name > H > -------- -------- ------------- ------------------------- > ----- > 1 1983 (undefined) Ceres > 3.34 > 2 2001 (undefined) Pallas > 4.13 > 4 1981 (undefined) Vesta > 3.20 > 19308 1998 1996 TO66 [...unnamed...] > 4.42 > 19521 1999 1998 WH24 Chaos > 4.75 > 20000 2000 2000 WR106 Varuna > 3.52 > 24835 1999 1995 SM55 [...unnamed...] > 4.70 > 26375 2002 1999 DE9 [...unnamed...] > 4.83 > 28978 2000 2001 KX76 Ixion > 3.38 > 38628 2002 2000 EB173 Huya > 4.67 > 42301 2000 2001 UR163 [...unnamed...] > 3.97 > 47171 2000 1999 TC36 [...unnamed...] > 4.72 > 50000 2001 2002 LM60 Quaoar > 2.67 > 55565 2002 2002 AW197 [...unnamed...] > 3.27 > 55636 2000 2002 TX300 [...unnamed...] > 3.09 > 55637 2003 2002 UX25 [...unnamed...] > 3.60 > 82075 2002 2000 YW134 [...unnamed...] > 4.76 > 84522 2003 2002 TC302 [...unnamed...] > 3.84 > 84922 2003 2003 VS2 [...unnamed...] > 3.99 > 90377 2004 2003 VB12 Sedna > 1.56 > 90482 2001 2004 DW Orcus > 2.30 > 90568 2001 2004 GV9 [...unnamed...] > 3.68 > 119951 2002 2002 KX14 [...unnamed...] > 4.50 > 120132 2003 2003 FY128 [...unnamed...] > 4.48 > 120178 2002 2003 OP32 [...unnamed...] > 4.17 > 120347 2000 2004 SB60 [...unnamed...] > 4.35 > 120348 2001 2004 TY364 [...unnamed...] > 4.25 > 134340 2006 (undefined) > -0.70 > 136108 2006 2003 EL61 [...unnamed...] > 0.17 > 136199 2003 2003 UB313 > -1.24 > 136472 2006 2005 FY9 > unnamed...] -0.48 > 144897 2008 2004 UX10 [...unnamed...] > 4.60 > 145451 2008 2005 RM43 [...unnamed...] > 4.40 > 145452 2008 2005 RN43 [...unnamed...] > 3.90 > 145453 2008 2005 RR43 [...unnamed...] > 4.00 > 145480 2008 2005 TB190 [...unnamed...] > 4.70 > 174567 2008 2003 MW12 [...unnamed...] > 3.60 > 175113 2008 2004 PF115 [...unnamed...] > 4.70 > 411748 2002 2000 CN105 [...unnamed...] > 4.79 > 425947 2008 2001 QF298 [...unnamed...] > 4.70 > 444509 2008 2002 CY248 [...unnamed...] > 4.90 > 450470 1998 2002 MS4 [...unnamed...] > 3.81 > 466094 2002 2002 XV93 [...unnamed...] > 4.79 > 467215 2003 2003 AZ84 [...unnamed...] > 3.80 > 473517 2004 2003 QW90 [...unnamed...] > 4.61 > 473783 2008 2003 QX113 [...unnamed...] > 4.90 > 484032 2008 2003 UZ413 [...unnamed...] > 4.30 > 499052 2004 2004 PR107 [...unnamed...] > 4.60 > 512847 2008 2004 XR190 [...unnamed...] > 4.50 > 529417 2005 2005 QU182 [...unnamed...] > 3.70 > 544279 2008 2005 UQ513 [...unnamed...] > 3.70 > 571571 2008 2006 QH181 [...unnamed...] > 3.80 > 602113 2008 2007 JH43 [...unnamed...] > 4.70 > 602114 2008 2007 JJ43 [...unnamed...] > 4.80 > 613828 2008 2007 UK126 [...unnamed...] > 3.50 > > (55 matches. To SELECT, enter record # (integer), followed by semi- > colon.) > ******************************************************************************* > But you said before that you don't believe in NASA's data. Why are you using their data? You said every astrologers are goofy except yourself, you tried to sell crap, and you're alone. It won't take you too long to go hungry.